My current work in progress is a historical novel partly set during the Great War. In order to write the time period accurately, I’ve been spending many hours reading and researching. One of my characters will be in the mud of Passchendaele in 1917. I visited the area in 2013. It is still chilling to think of the horrors that the soldiers endured.
The stalemate along the Western Front in 1917 looked like it might finally be breaking, with successes by British and Canadian forces in taking Messines and Vimy Ridges, respectively. The German salient had been pushed back and the plans to break the line were being formulated. The forthcoming battle would officially be known as the Third Battle of Ypres, but would be more famously known as The Battle of Passhendaele, after the little village a few miles to the east of the site.
The area from Ypres to Passchendaele slopes continuously uphill—not an ideal way for the British to forge into battle. Even the soil around the area was about to become an obstacle. It had the consistency of clay—dense and heavy and prone to holding water. Before the war, the farmers who worked this land had needed to build up an elaborate drainage system to draw off the water during the rainy season. The battles fought in the area over the course of the war had demolished this fragile system, with the result that rain-soaked fields would become mires of thick, clinging mud. The success of the British advance in the Third Battle of Ypres was dependent on the weather cooperating.
June 1917 proved to be a good month for getting ready. In July the weather was for the most part agreeable, and the gun batteries came forward and took up their positions. The standard means of attack was to use heavy artillery to bombard the enemy in their trenches and then to send infantry ‘over the top’ to fight man to man. The initial bombardment could go on for weeks at a time, rendering the field into which the soldiers would follow a nightmare landscape of craters, rubble and ash. Though this approach had so far not proven to be an effective method, the generals were still enthralled by the idea of ‘more’ —more artillery cannons, more guns, more men, and not to mention, more casualties.
Airplanes had become a means of reconnaissance and the reports brought back by the pilots stated that the German morale was low and conditions looked good for an attack. However, British intelligence-gathering during the war was neither very objective nor accurate. The spies were told what the commanders hoped was true, and the spies basically confirmed that it was.
The artillery began raining death on July 18th, with the infantry attack scheduled to begin on July 31st. But as the shriek and blast of the heavy mortars went on for those two weeks, the weather began to turn. At first, occasional heavy rains filled the myriad shell holes littering the fields and due to the poor drainage, they remained that way. Still, on that last day of July 1917, the men crawled from the trenches at day break, carrying 60-80 pounds of gear on their backs and began to advance. They made two miles by nightfall and considered it a good start.
The next day, the first of August, it began to rain in earnest. This was no summer shower; it was a steady, soaking, continuous downpour. It rained for two weeks straight. The already saturated soil began to dissolve. The shell holes filled and the engineers tried to build up wooden walkways around them. The soldiers were slipping in the mud, falling in, and with their heavy packs weighing them down, drowning. The boards laid down to create footing were little better. In the rain, they became slick so that the soldiers had to tread carefully. The Germans shot the slow moving infantrymen off the boards, they fell in the mud and drowned.
August gave way to September and still the rain fell. Despite all this misery, the attack went on and finally Canadian troops took and held the village of Passchendaele. The advance on the Ypres Salient had gained the British four miles at the cost of a quarter million men.
British military historian Basil Liddell Hart relates the story of a staff officer who visited the battlefield after the fact. As he gazed out at the sea of mud, he said, “My God, did we send men to advance in that?” He then broke down and wept as his escort led him away.
There would never be another battle like Passchendaele. F. Scott Fitzgerald wrote in Tender Is the Night that battles like those fought on the Western Front could never be fought again:
“See that little stream we could walk to it in two minutes. It took the British a month to walk to it a whole empire walking very slowly, dying in front and pushing forward behind. And another empire walked very slowly backward a few inches a day, leaving the dead like a million bloody rugs. No Europeans will ever do that again in this generation. …This took religion and years of plenty and tremendous sureties and the exact relation that existed between the classes.”
He meant the only people that could fight that sort of battle were those who possessed a sure faith in their countries, their institutions, and their own unquestioned value systems. Only that kind of faith and confidence could prepare men sufficiently to endure the hell of such battles. Men like that were now gone: rotting in the fields of Belgium and France or if they lived, no longer in possession of such faith.
Nevertheless, the war itself had another year to run. New methods and new weapons were about to change the practice of war forever.
Images courtesy: Canadian War Museum, The Times of London, The Spectator, and Wikipedia
Oh, Meg! This is fabulous. ‘Like a million bloody rugs’ wowwwww was he able to pierce the mind’s eye with that!
What an excellent job you are doing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That is an amazing line. I had to include it. Thanks so much, Rita!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re welcome, Sister. It’s a fabulous read. On my to buy list ❤️
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you! Now I just have to finish writing it!
LikeLiked by 2 people
All in good time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
😃😃
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh wait! You mean the F. Scott Fitzgerald book! LOL!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
No!!!!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha! Ok, phew! 😅
LikeLiked by 1 person
😂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Unbelievable. 250,000 lives lost to gain 4 Miles?!? What the fuck is wrong with human beings? Jesus. 😔
LikeLiked by 1 person
To be fully accurate, the casualty list includes injuries, too. But even so, the loss was devastating. Many of the injured died because the stretcher bearers couldn’t get them from the field fast enough to save them, thanks to the mud. It was a horrendous ordeal.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Unreal. It’s just plain sinful for this kinda stuff to be forced upon an entire generation based on the political whims and ego stroking of a handful of so-called “leaders”. Those men lost could’ve included great minds, artists, teachers, someone who may have developed a cure for cancer, etc. All over invisible lines and pissing in someone’s Wheaties. Will humans never learn? 😔
LikeLiked by 2 people
That is exactly right. The leaders encamped safely behind the lines not even fully aware of the conditions they were sending them into. The French army mutinied at one point and they very nearly quit the war. It was only by change of command and a promise to improve conditions that they held on a little longer. It amazes that revolt didn’t happen in all of the combatant forces. Things were no better for the Germans, their solders were at the mercy of their foolish leaders as well.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oh, I’m sure they were. I don’t doubt that for a second. It’s reprehensible on all sides involved. And continues to be so. We never learn.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nope. Plus ca change plus cest la meme chose. The more things change the more they stay the same.
LikeLiked by 1 person
No shit. It’s pathetic, really. 😣
LikeLiked by 1 person
It was unbelievably hideous. And Liddell Hart’s account of the First World War is one of the best I’ve read.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It really was. I’ve only read bits and pieces for the sake of time. But I really should delve into the entire thing. Not exactly light summer reading!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s not, but it’s the kind of book that should be read by anyone who has the power to order others to go to war.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, required reading – if only such lessons would be taken to heart.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Trouble is, every generation seems to need to learn them afresh.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And there you have definition of insanity: doing the same things over and over and expecting a different outcome!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Absolutely.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The more you read of this, the more compelling it becomes to read more. Ask career soldiers and most would agree on the futility of war!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, for sure. I can attest to being compelled. I almost wish I’d studied and specialized in this history in school. Then again… what a way to spend a career: analyzing this gruesome meat grinder of a war!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It rather negates the definition of humanity!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Such a waste of life. It’s true, war is hell. What was it like to stand on the soil were the war of Passchendaele took place? That could be a topic in another post. Love to hear your thoughts. Your research and creative process will make this a good book.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s back to quiet green pastures. I’ll have to pull out my travel notes and photos and maybe do another post. Thanks so much for your interest!
LikeLike
This is an amazingly great piece! So descriptive and horrible. I will never understand war and how people justify the carnage. But you have brought the scene to life. Bravo!!👏
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much, Eilene! This war is so grim but fascinating. I can’t help but get sidetracked with the research!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I do understand!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m a war history buff, this is amazing!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Holly! It’s hard to summarize these events – so many intriguing and important things happened!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s captivating.
LikeLiked by 1 person