Photo my own:
Share this:
- Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
Meg Sorick, Author/Artist 
Oh, that’s strange. I like it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, it grabbed me too. A lot of his pieces are complicated. This one was simple but profound I thought.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oooh… that is so cool!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I thought so too! Spent the afternoon at the art museum last Thursday, by myself! And it was glorious!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very interesting. One could philosophize for a while on this one. A critic, perhaps forever entombed by their concrete views…. Of course, factor in the reflection and it points the figure back at the viewer.
LikeLiked by 1 person
*finger not figure. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Got it! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, for sure. The original intent of the piece was to be a slam against art criticism. Nevertheless, the artist has left much open to interpretation: the observer makes the art. This is an attempt to bring the visual and verbal to equivalence. One not being superior to the other.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A bit of a looker!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha! Yes, indeed…
LikeLiked by 1 person